Monday, Jun 01, 2020 | Last Update : 05:47 AM IST

68th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra65168280812197 Tamil Nadu2024611313157 Delhi173877846398 Gujarat1635692321007 Rajasthan83654855184 Madhya Pradesh78914444343 Uttar Pradesh77014651213 West Bengal48131775302 Andhra Pradesh3461228960 Bihar3359120915 Karnataka292299749 Telangana2499141277 Jammu and Kashmir234190828 Punjab2197194942 Odisha17239779 Haryana172194019 Kerala120957510 Assam9361044 Uttarakhand493794 Jharkhand4621914 Chhatisgarh4471021 Chandigarh2891994 Tripura2711720 Himachal Pradesh223634 Goa70420 Manipur6060 Puducherry57230 Nagaland3600 Meghalaya27121 Arunachal Pradesh310 Mizoram110 Sikkim100

Let Ayodhya issue lie, say influential Muslims

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Nov 26, 2019, 6:52 am IST
Updated : Nov 26, 2019, 6:52 am IST

The signatories have agreed that the court order is judicially flawed but keeping it alive would harm and not help Indian Muslims.

Naseeruddin Shah
 Naseeruddin Shah

Mumbai: Around 100 prominent Muslims, including actor Naseeruddin Shah, Shabana Azmi, journalist and social activist Javed Anand, and professionals like lawyers, scholars and journalists have issued a joint statement opposing the decision to file a review petition in the Supreme Court challenging the Ram janmabhoomi dispute judgment.

The signatories have agreed that the court order is judicially flawed but keeping it alive would harm and not help Indian Muslims.

“We, the undersigned, are deeply concerned over the decision of several of the Muslim litigants in the Ayodhya dispute to challenge the recent unanimous decision of the constitution bench of the Supreme Court in favour of a Ram Temple at the disputed plot. We share the unhappiness of the Indian Muslim community, constitutional experts and secular organisations over the fact that the highest court in the land has placed faith above law in arriving at its decision,” the statement read.

“Many have been advising Muslims to ‘move on’. Our appeal to fellow Muslims is to ‘move away’ from the mandir-masjid dispute since it only helps to mask the real agenda of the Sangh Parivar: the replacement of our secular-democratic republic with a Hindu Rashtra.  We believe that continuation of the dispute in the court will add fuel to anti-Muslim propaganda and Islamophobia, aid further communal polarisation.”

Mr Anand said, “It is not finalised yet, but we are contemplating holding a public meeting on this issue, perhaps a fortnight from today.”

Referring to the news, that appeared a few days back in which Jamiat-e-Ulema Hind Mehmood Madni faction had apparently stated that they are not in favour of the review petition, Mr Anand said, “Opinion within the community itself is sharply divided.”

Tags: naseeruddin shah, shabana azmi, ayodhya issue
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT