Wednesday, Sep 23, 2020 | Last Update : 08:30 AM IST

182nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra122438091634833015 Andhra Pradesh6317495518215410 Tamil Nadu5473374919718871 Karnataka5268764233778145 Uttar Pradesh3588932895945135 Delhi2492592133045014 West Bengal2283021989834421 Odisha184122149379763 Telangana1726081419301042 Bihar169856155824870 Assam159320129130578 Kerala13863398720554 Gujarat1247671051913337 Rajasthan116881972841352 Haryana113075908841177 Madhya Pradesh108167836182007 Punjab99930754092860 Chhatisgarh8618347653680 Jharkhand7267358543626 Jammu and Kashmir65026421151024 Uttarakhand4177729000501 Goa2875322726360 Puducherry2319118065467 Tripura2227215441245 Himachal Pradesh124387836125 Chandigarh102987411123 Manipur9010683859 Arunachal Pradesh7385540813 Nagaland5544445110 Meghalaya4733252838 Sikkim2447190529 Mizoram158510120
  Life   Health  01 Dec 2018  Smoking bans tied to lower blood pressure in non-smokers

Smoking bans tied to lower blood pressure in non-smokers

REUTERS
Published : Dec 1, 2018, 12:49 pm IST
Updated : Dec 1, 2018, 12:53 pm IST

Results suggest that smoke-free policies help to protect non-smokers from these effects.

It’s not clear why the smoking bans were not linked to reductions in diastolic blood pressure or the risk of developing high blood pressure.
 It’s not clear why the smoking bans were not linked to reductions in diastolic blood pressure or the risk of developing high blood pressure.

Non-smokers who live where smoking is banned in public places may have lower blood pressure than non-smokers who aren’t protected by these types of laws, a U.S. study suggests.

While smoke-free policies have been associated with fewer hospitalizations for heart disease and a lower risk of heart attacks, less is known about how these laws impact blood pressure, particularly for non-smokers, researchers note in the Journal of the American Heart Association.

 

The researchers examined data on 2,606 adult non-smokers in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study to see if there was a connection between state, county and local smoking bans and participants’ blood pressure.

Living in places with smoking bans was associated with lower systolic blood pressure - the “top number” that represents the pressure blood exerts against artery walls when the heart beats. Smoking bans didn’t appear to influence diastolic blood pressure - the “bottom number” that represents pressure exerted when the heart is at rest - or the overall risk of developing high blood pressure.

 “Since secondhand smoke has been found to negatively affect the functioning of blood vessels, our results suggest that smoke-free policies help to protect non-smokers from these effects,” said study leader Stephanie Mayne of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, in email to Reuters Health.

 

It’s not clear why the smoking bans were not linked to reductions in diastolic blood pressure or the risk of developing high blood pressure, said Mayne, who did the study while at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago.

 “The differences in systolic blood pressure seen in our study are small on an individual level, and may not have been large enough to significantly change the proportion of non-smokers meeting the criteria for high blood pressure,” Mayne added.

 “However, higher systolic blood pressure, even if it is below the cutoff for high blood pressure, increases someone’s risk of cardiovascular disease,” Mayne said. “So, even small reductions in systolic blood pressure as a result of smoking bans can meaningfully reduce rates of cardiovascular disease from a population perspective.”

 

In adults, 120/80 mmHg (millimeters of mercury) is the top limit of a healthy blood pressure.

The CARDIA study enrolled adults from four U.S. cities: Birmingham, Alabama; Chicago; Minneapolis; and Oakland, California, in 1985 and 1986 when they were 18 to 30 years old. Participants had follow-up exams 30 years later.

Researchers based their analysis on data from 1995 to 2011 to match up with the timing of smoking bans.

At each exam, participants living in areas with smoke-free policies affecting public places had lower average systolic blood pressure than those in areas without smoke-free policies, and the difference increased over time.

 

By year 25, participants in smoke-free areas had systolic blood pressure values on average 1.14 mmHg to 1.52 mmHg lower than those in areas without smoke-free environments, depending on the which locations - workplaces, bars, or restaurants - were covered by the laws.

The study can’t prove whether or how smoking bans directly lower blood pressure.

Even so, the results add to the evidence suggesting that these laws can have a positive impact on heart health, said Judith Prochaska, a researcher at Stanford University in California who wasn’t involved in the study.

 “The relevance is that a population decline in blood pressure associated with smoking bans is a potential mechanism for the decline in heart attack rates observed in prior studies,” Prochaska said by email. “The study findings suggest that the benefits observed in reduced heart attacks may be related to clean air laws aiding in lowering blood pressure levels.”

 

Tags: smoking, smoking ban, low blood pressure, non-smokers, health and well being, diastolic blood pressure, high blood pressure