Wednesday, Jul 08, 2020 | Last Update : 08:36 PM IST

106th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra2237241231929448 Tamil Nadu118594711161636 Delhi102831742173165 Gujarat37636267441978 Uttar Pradesh2996819627313 Telangana2761216287313 Karnataka2681511100417 West Bengal2383715790804 Rajasthan2140416575472 Andhra Pradesh211979745252 Haryana1799913645279 Madhya Pradesh1562711768622 Bihar12525933898 Assam12523833016 Odisha10097670354 Jammu and Kashmir89315399143 Punjab67494554175 Kerala5895345228 Chhatisgarh3415272814 Uttarakhand3230262143 Jharkhand3018210422 Goa190311568 Tripura171612481 Manipur14307710 Himachal Pradesh107876410 Puducherry104351714 Nagaland6443030 Chandigarh4924017 Arunachal Pradesh270922 Mizoram1971390 Sikkim125650 Meghalaya94432
  Metros   Mumbai  20 Nov 2019  Relaxing withdrawal limits: RBI to Bombay HC

Relaxing withdrawal limits: RBI to Bombay HC

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Nov 20, 2019, 1:53 am IST
Updated : Nov 20, 2019, 2:00 am IST

The crisis at the bank is attributed to the loans allocated to realty firm the Housing Development Infrastructure Ltd (HDIL) without scrutiny.

Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative (PMC) account holders protest outside the Bombay high court in Mumbai on Tuesday. (Photo: Asian Age)
 Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative (PMC) account holders protest outside the Bombay high court in Mumbai on Tuesday. (Photo: Asian Age)

Mumbai: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Tuesday filed a detailed affidavit in the Bombay high court explaining the steps it intends to take to protect depositors of Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) bank.

The court was informed that those in need of money due to emergencies like medical treatment and marriage can approach the RBI executive and get Rs one lakh. However, not satisfied with the RBI affidavit, the depositors protested outside the high court.

On September 23, the RBI had imposed regulatory restrictions on the PMC Bank for six months over alleged financial irregularities. Many depositors have filed petitions in the HC challenging this cap demanding that they should be allowed to withdraw more amounts.

On the last date of hearing, the HC had directed the RBI to file an affidavit stating details of steps taken to safeguard the interest of the depositors.

The RBI, in its affidavit, has said, “To mitigate the hardships of the depositors, the RBI has enabled withdrawal beyond the stipulated amount on hardship grounds like medical treatment, marriage, education, livelihood and other hardships, subject to a ceiling of Rs one lakh on medical ground and `50,000 in other cases.”

RBI counsel Venkatesh Dhond contended before the division bench of Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari and Justice R.I. Chagla that such withdrawal restrictions were necessary to safeguard the interests of the bank and its depositors.

He also informed the court that depositors facing hardships can approach the RBI-appointed administrator and seek withdrawal up to Rs one lakh.

Refusing to interfere with the RBI’s decision of restricting the withdrawal, the bench said that the depositors cannot say that their rights are superior to that of the bank’s. The court’s response was to the arguments of one of the petitioners’ lawyer Pradnya Talekar who had said that depositors should not bear the brunt of wrongdoings done by senior officials of the PMC bank and that the RBI cannot impose such withdrawal restrictions.

The bench also asked how can this court say that the action initiated by RBI is contrary to the public interest or the depositor's interest. After perusing the affidavit, the court deferred hearing on the petition on December 4.

Speaking to The Asian Age, another lawyer Eknath Dhokale said, “Reply of the RBI has not disclosed anything new, raising the withdrawal limits can’t be said as steps taken to protect the depositors.”

The crisis at the bank is attributed to the loans allocated to realty firm the Housing Development Infrastructure Ltd (HDIL) without scrutiny. These loans later turned into non-performing assets (NPAs).

Tags: reserve bank of india, bombay high court