Monday, Aug 10, 2020 | Last Update : 09:59 PM IST

139th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra51533235171017757 Tamil Nadu2969012386384927 Andhra Pradesh2278601387122036 Karnataka178087939083198 Delhi1454271305874111 Uttar Pradesh122609726502069 West Bengal95554671202059 Bihar7972051315429 Telangana7949555999627 Gujarat71064542382652 Assam5883842326145 Rajasthan5249738235789 Odisha4592731785321 Haryana4163534781483 Madhya Pradesh3902529020996 Kerala3433121832109 Jammu and Kashmir2489717003472 Punjab2390315319586 Jharkhand185168998177 Chhatisgarh12148880996 Uttarakhand96326134125 Goa871259575 Tripura6161417641 Puducherry5382320187 Manipur3752204411 Himachal Pradesh3371218114 Nagaland27819048 Arunachal Pradesh215514823 Chandigarh151590425 Meghalaya10624906 Sikkim8664971 Mizoram6082980
  Metros   Mumbai  27 Feb 2020  PIL against Waris Pathan for alleged hate speech

PIL against Waris Pathan for alleged hate speech

THE ASIAN AGE. | KALPESH MHAMUNKAR
Published : Feb 27, 2020, 5:53 am IST
Updated : Feb 27, 2020, 5:53 am IST

The petition states that Mr Pathan is an advocate by profession and well aware of the law.

Waris Pathan
 Waris Pathan

Mumbai: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Bombay high court (HC) seeking action against AIMIM leader Waris Pathan for recently delivering an inflammatory speech. The petitioner is a social worker, who has alleged that Mr Pathan is not a layman but a lawyer by profession and understands the legal implications of his statements.

Petitioner Kishor Sohani, a businessman, has alleged that Mr Pathan rendered a hate speech, which is a direct threat to public harmony within the country, especially in the current scenario where many people across the country are protesting the CAA.

 

According to the petitioner, Mr Pathan has forgotten that India is a secular country having many different religions, languages, attir-es, festivals and foods and that the people of India believe in coexistence, bro-therhood, love and unity.

The petitioner said that India is home to people following various religions such as Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism and Zoroastrianism and therefore, an example of unity in diversity. The petitioner said that history shows how religious hatred prompted the Partition in 1947. He alleged that this is not the first time when Mr Pathan has made such a speech. On March 16, 2016, he was suspended as a me-mber of the Legislative As-sembly since he refused to say, “Bharat Mata Ki Jai”.

 

The Constitution of India has given the right to freedom of speech and expression to citizens but it also imposes reasonable restriction on citizens so that their speech and expression will not adversely affect the security of the state.

The petition states that Mr Pathan is an advocate by profession and well aware of the law. As a leader of the AIMIM, whatever he says has an impact on the party’s followers and hence, he should take the utmost care while rendering any kind of speech. According to the petition, Mr Pathan is trying to gain political mileage by spreading hate among people.

The petitioner claims that Mr Pathan’s speech during the anti-CAA rally in Bengaluru was not accidental or a mistake or slip of the tongue but well-planned agenda put forward purposely. The petitioner demanded that Mr Pathan be discouraged so that others take a lesson that the agenda of hatred in the name of religion is not acceptable. The petitioner sought direction to the Election Commission of India to permanently ban Mr Pathan from contesting elections in any part of the country. It also sought direction for Mr Pathan’s arrest.

 

Tags: waris pathan