Monday, Aug 10, 2020 | Last Update : 08:34 PM IST

139th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra51533235171017757 Tamil Nadu2969012386384927 Andhra Pradesh2278601387122036 Karnataka178087939083198 Delhi1454271305874111 Uttar Pradesh122609726502069 West Bengal95554671202059 Bihar7972051315429 Telangana7949555999627 Gujarat71064542382652 Assam5883842326145 Rajasthan5249738235789 Odisha4592731785321 Haryana4163534781483 Madhya Pradesh3902529020996 Kerala3433121832109 Jammu and Kashmir2489717003472 Punjab2390315319586 Jharkhand185168998177 Chhatisgarh12148880996 Uttarakhand96326134125 Goa871259575 Tripura6161417641 Puducherry5382320187 Manipur3752204411 Himachal Pradesh3371218114 Nagaland27819048 Arunachal Pradesh215514823 Chandigarh151590425 Meghalaya10624906 Sikkim8664971 Mizoram6082980
  Opinion   Edit  21 Mar 2020  AA Edit: Nirbhaya hangings were nothing to gloat about

AA Edit: Nirbhaya hangings were nothing to gloat about

Published : Mar 21, 2020, 12:35 am IST
Updated : Mar 21, 2020, 12:35 am IST

Reactions from either side of the ideological divide were bereft of sobriety

The scene outside the Tihar jail at dawn when the rape convicts in the Nirbhaya rape case were hanged.
 The scene outside the Tihar jail at dawn when the rape convicts in the Nirbhaya rape case were hanged.

At 5.30 am on Friday, Akshay Thakur, Pawan Gupta, Vinay Sharma and Mukesh Singh, the four convicts in the 2012 Delhi bus gang-rape and murder case were hanged until death. The hanging was carried out as per schedule in Tihar Jail after a three-judge Supreme Court bench rejected the final plea by the convicts’ lawyer, A.P. Singh, to stay their execution in a late-night hearing. In 2015, the main accused in the case, Ram Singh, had allegedly committed suicide. Another accused, who was 17 at the time of the crime, was released from a correctional centre, also in 2015.

Four death warrants had been issued in the case but the law took eight years, not an inordinately long span of time, to bring the criminals to justice. The news, no doubt, brings relief and closure to the victim’s family and friends. But instead of receiving it with appropriate soberness and respect, large sections of the society, perhaps cheerled by our honourable Prime Minister, has been reacting with an unseemly, self-congratulatory glee, turning the execution into a gladiatorial sideshow, broadcast via “reality TV”. This is distressing.


However, equally irresponsible is the superficial counter-reaction by the “woke” intelligentsia that, without reason or proportion, has picked this occasion to argue enthusiastically either against capital punishment per se or against the death penalty for the crime of rape. Perhaps, they, themselves, have only lately come around to the realisation that supporting the latter encourages the dangerous notion that a rape victim is damaged for life. But in so doing, they are ignoring two important facts — (a) Under the Indian Penal Code, the punishment for rape of an adult woman is between seven years of imprisonment and a life term, depending on the seriousness of the crime, and (b) the Supreme Court, in its wisdom, did deem this (murder) case “rarest of rare”, and, accordingly, worthy of this sentence.


Meanwhile, similar other notions and practices that stop society from following the letter and spirit of the law, rob Indian women of their agency and contribute to their “unsafety” continue to remain alive and well, unchallenged.

Tags: nirbhaya hangings, rape, nirbhaya mother