SC dismisses Chidambaram's bail plea in INX case, calls his petition 'infructuous'

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain Congress leader P Chidambaram's plea challenging the dismissal of his anticipatory bail in a corruption case lodged by the CBI in the INX media scam.

A bench of Justices R Banumathi and A S Bopanna said the petition has become infructuous as he was arrested on August 21. Chidambaram had moved the Supreme Court the same day the High Court dismissed his anticipatory bail plea.

The apex court, however, asked him to move a regular bail plea before the appropriate court. The bench said however that Chidambaram is at a liberty to seek remedy in accordance with the law. Chidambaram, whose CBI custody is ending today, will be produced before a trial court where the agency can further seek his custody.

During the course of proceeding on Monday, Kapil Sibal, senior counsel representing the former Union finance minister, said that he had mentioned the matter for urgent listing on August 21 but the court did not list it until August 23.

"I have a fundamental right. It is a matter of my liberty. I should have been heard by the Supreme Court," the counsel contended.

Sibal narrated the sequence of events from August 20 to August 21. "The whole purpose of the CBI was to defeat the fundamental rights of my client, and his liberty guaranteed under the Constitution. He should have been heard but the matter was listed for hearing on Friday and not even Thursday".

Sibal argued, "If the arrest had taken place and I had filed it later, the petition against Delhi High Court would be infructuous. I have a right to be heard under the law."

After the High Court rejected Chidambaram's pre-arrest bail on August 20, he was arrested and sent to CBI's custody by a trial court for four days, ending on Monday.

However, the bench said on that ground Chidambaram's plea against the high court decision cannot be entertained. "So far as the CBI case is concerned, we are not inclined to hear it. We dismiss the special leave petition (of Chidambaram) in CBI case," the bench said.

At present the apex court bench is hearing issues relating to the money laundering case lodged by the ED in connection with the INX media scam.

After the High Court rejected Chidambaram's pre-arrest bail on August 20, he was arrested and sent to CBI's custody by a trial court for four days, ending on Monday.

At present the apex court bench is hearing issues relating to the money laundering case lodged by the ED in connection with the INX media scam.

On Friday, the apex court had granted protection from arrest till Monday to Chidambaram in the money-laundering case lodged by the Enforcement Directorate.

The court has sought replies from Enforcement Directorate on Chidambaram’s plea and directed that all the three matters should be listed on Monday.

Chidambaram has contended that it is violation of his fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution that his petition challenging the High Court order was not heard by the apex court on July 20 and 21 and he was arrested on the August 21 night.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for ED, had said that lot of “hue and cry” and “political vendetta” was alleged by the petitioner (Chidambaram) and his party colleagues but “I am saying with a great sense of responsibility that this is a case of money laundering of a monumental magnitude”.

“CBI has recorded statement of Indrani Mukherjea, which will be tested in the trial, that she and her husband Peter had gone to Chidambaram for FIPB approval and he (Chidambaram) had asked them to take care of his son,” Mehta had argued.

The CBI had registered an FIR on May 15, 2017, alleging irregularities in the Foreign Investment Promotion Board clearances granted to the INX Media group for receiving overseas funds of Rs 305 crore in 2007 during Chidambaram’s tenure as finance minister.

Thereafter, the ED lodged a money-laundering case in 2017.

Chidambaram was arrested on August 21 night from his Jor Bagh residence by the CBI in the corruption case and was produced before a trial court on August 22, which remanded him to four-day CBI custody till August 26.