Daljit Singh's job in line after ICC's poor' rating for Pune pitch

Daljit's position will certainly be under threat as this is the second adverse ICC rating in 14 months.

Update: 2017-03-01 06:09 GMT
Daljit Snigh was in charge when the Nagpur pitch was also rated 'poor' by ICC match referee Jeff Crowe during the India versus South Africa Test match in November 2015 that ended inside three days with an emphatic victory for hosts. (Photo: BCCI)

New Delhi: After ICC rated Pune pitch, which was used for the opening Test between India and England, as “poor”, senior pitch curator Daljit Singh has landed in trouble. While Pandurang Salgaoncar was the pitch curator at the Maharashtra Cricket Association Stadium, it was prepared under the guidance of Daljit Singh.

In fact Daljit was in charge when the Nagpur pitch was also rated 'poor' by ICC match referee Jeff Crowe during the India versus South Africa Test match in November 2015 that ended inside three days with an emphatic victory for hosts.

Another showcause by the ICC certainly has not gone unnoticed by the Committee of Administrators and BCCI CEO Rahul Johri will have to frame a reply within 14 days as per global body's norm.

"Even if there were instructions from team management, Daljit could have just ignored them. No one can pressurise the curator if he doesn't want to buckle down. But Daljit has had history of succumbing to demands of team management, giving one designer track after another. It's just that Nagpur and Pune were too bad even for his comfort. The COA might look into the matter," a top BCCI source told PTI.

Daljit's position will certainly be under threat as this is the second adverse ICC rating in 14 months.

There are some rumours in BCCI circle that one senior functionary among the existing lot called up in Pune at the behest of team management but that was merely a telephonic conversation and nothing documented.

Since there are no written instructions from the team management or BCCI, the buck stops at Daljit, who is already 79 and has survived as Lodha reforms doesn't specify the age of a curator like selectors (60 years) or administrators (70 years).

Tags:    

Similar News