Sunday, Aug 09, 2020 | Last Update : 02:22 AM IST

137th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra49026232728117092 Tamil Nadu2850242275754690 Andhra Pradesh2069601204641842 Karnataka164924842322998 Delhi1427231282324082 Uttar Pradesh113378668341981 West Bengal89666630601954 Bihar7179446294400 Gujarat68855517922604 Assam5549737225132 Rajasthan4941835186763 Odisha4255028698292 Haryana4005433444467 Madhya Pradesh3729827621962 Kerala3170019147103 Jammu and Kashmir2392716218449 Punjab2193014040539 Jharkhand165427503154 Chhatisgarh11408831987 Uttarakhand89015731112 Goa7947559570 Telangana751354330615 Tripura6014408437 Puducherry5123291475 Manipur3466192610 Himachal Pradesh3206200813 Nagaland26578247 Arunachal Pradesh204913263 Chandigarh137482023 Meghalaya10234236 Sikkim8544061 Mizoram5672890
  India   All India  23 Aug 2019  Multiplicity of laws delaying infra plans: Supreme Court

Multiplicity of laws delaying infra plans: Supreme Court

Published : Aug 23, 2019, 3:42 am IST
Updated : Aug 23, 2019, 3:42 am IST

Besides Justice Ramana, Justice M. Shantanagoudar and Justice Ajay Rastogi were hearing the matter.

The Supreme Court of India. (Photo: PTI)
 The Supreme Court of India. (Photo: PTI)

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday said that the multiplicity of laws relating to land acquisition and environmental clearance was creating confusion in the execution of infrastructure projects including express highway projects.

“Confusion was due to many statutes — the National Highway Authority Act, 1988, The National Highway Act, 1956 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986,” said Justice N.V. Ramana in the course of the hearing of a plea by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenging the Madras high court order quashing the notification for the acquisition of lands for the Chennai-Salem Express Highway.


Besides Justice Ramana, Justice M. Shantanagoudar and Justice Ajay Rastogi were hearing the matter.

At the outset of the hearing, Justice Shantanagoudar asked why NHAI was acquiring land without the project even being notified or an environment clearance being there. “You acquire lands from farmers without an environmental clearance being given by the ministry of environment and forest, leaving the farmers with nothing to do,” he said.

Solicitor-general Tushar Mehta who appeared for the NHAI, defended the acquisition, saying, “When we go to the MoEF for an environmental clearance, there has to be something on the paper backing the project.” He said that the lands would be acquired but the possession would not be taken.


Mr Mehta said that the Chennai-Salem Express Highway project was a part of the Bharat Mala Pariyojana and its stalling would have wide repercussions on other projects proposed under the project in the entire country.

Lawyers appearing for affected farmers and the PIL petitioners, however, disagreed, and told the court that initially land were acquired for the expansion of Chennai-Madurai highway but the consultant engaged for the project, instead, submitted a report for the Chennai-Salem project, which was an entirely new project involving different proceedings.

Tags: supreme court, national highway act