Saturday, Aug 15, 2020 | Last Update : 08:35 AM IST

142nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra54831338184318650 Tamil Nadu3145202563135278 Andhra Pradesh2641421709242378 Karnataka1964941126333511 Delhi1494601343184167 Uttar Pradesh140775887862280 West Bengal98459671202059 Telangana8647563074665 Bihar8274154139450 Gujarat71064542382652 Assam5883842326145 Rajasthan5249738235789 Odisha4592731785321 Haryana4163534781483 Madhya Pradesh3902529020996 Kerala3811424922127 Jammu and Kashmir2489717003472 Punjab2390315319586 Jharkhand185168998177 Chhatisgarh12148880996 Uttarakhand96326134125 Goa871259575 Tripura6161417641 Puducherry5382320187 Manipur3752204411 Himachal Pradesh3371218114 Nagaland30119738 Arunachal Pradesh223115923 Chandigarh1595100425 Meghalaya11154986 Sikkim9105101 Mizoram6203230
  India   All India  24 Aug 2019  Supreme Court to examine criminalisation of triple talaq

Supreme Court to examine criminalisation of triple talaq

THE ASIAN AGE. | PARMOD KUMAR
Published : Aug 24, 2019, 2:45 am IST
Updated : Aug 24, 2019, 3:44 am IST

The court has issued notice both on declaring instant triple talaq a criminal offence and retrospective applicability of the law.

Supreme Court of India (Photo: PTI)
 Supreme Court of India (Photo: PTI)

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to examine the challenge to the provisions in the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, that criminalises the instant triple talaq and provides for the imprisonment of husband for divorcing wife and the retrospective applicability of the law.

Seeking the Centre’s response on multiple petitions challenging different aspects of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, also known as triple talaq law, the bench of Jusrice N.V.Ramana and Justice Ajay Rastogi referring to child marriage and dowry asked if a practice having no sanction of law still prevails why can’t Parliament make a law to curb it. The court has issued notice both on declaring instant triple talaq a criminal offence and retrospective applicability of the law.

 

The court will examine can a legislation make a practice, declared void by the top court, an offence; the retrospective application of law and while considering bail plea by the husband, accused of pronouncing instant triple talaq, wife has to be heard.

Justice Ramana said that the provision that wife has to be heard while considering husband’s plea bail was akin to the provision of Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

The top court sought Centre’s response on petitions filed by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, Kerala- based Samastha Kerala Jamaithul Ulema and others — all challenging the validity of the triple talaq law. Addressing the court, senior counsel Salman Khurshid said that the top court constitution bench has already held instant triple talaq as void and with Parliament enacting the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, amounts to declaring it null and void once again.

 

The petitioner organisations Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, Samastha Kerala Jamaithul Ulema and others have  sought the declaration that the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 notified on July 31, 2019 is violative of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 123 of the Constitution of India and thus unconstitutional and unenforceable.

Seeking the stay of the operation of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, till the plea is decided by the court, the petitioners have contended that the law directed at Muslim community has national ramifications, which, if not checked, may lead to “polarization and disharmony” in society. .

 

“The Act has introduced penal legislation, specific to a class of persons based on religious identity.  It is causative of grave public mischief, which, if unchecked, may lead to polarization and disharmony in society”, says the petition by Samastha Kerala Jamaithul Ulema invoking Article 32 of the constitution for protecting the fundamental rights.

The intent behind the Act, the petition says is not “abolition of Triple Talaq but punishment of Muslim husbands” as Section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act provides for 3 year sentence when a Muslim husband pronounces Triple Talaq.

Assailing the provision that criminalizes the instant triple talaq, the petition by Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind, says, “Needless to say, that the Act criminalizes the pronouncement despite the fact that the marriage subsists even after the said pronouncement.”

 

It has described as “ill-conceived” and “excessive and disproportionate”, the provision providing for imprisonment upto three years qarguing that sentence in case of other serious offences is much less.

Tags: supreme court, triple talaq
Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi