Monday, Aug 03, 2020 | Last Update : 09:27 PM IST

132nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra44122827680915576 Tamil Nadu2576131964834132 Andhra Pradesh158764828861474 Delhi1376771233174004 Karnataka134819577252496 Uttar Pradesh92921533571730 West Bengal75516527301678 Telangana6766048609551 Gujarat63675466892482 Bihar5727036637322 Rajasthan4441031216706 Assam4290532385105 Haryana3651929690433 Odisha3491321955236 Madhya Pradesh3353523550886 Kerala259121446383 Jammu and Kashmir2141613127396 Punjab1785311466423 Jharkhand121884513115 Chhatisgarh9608699158 Uttarakhand7593443786 Goa6530466853 Tripura5248346323 Puducherry3806230952 Manipur283117377 Himachal Pradesh2654150813 Arunachal Pradesh19359693 Nagaland19356484 Chandigarh111769819 Meghalaya8742645 Sikkim6582891 Mizoram4702580
  India   All India  30 Aug 2019  Supreme Court reserves order on P Chidambaram’s petition

Supreme Court reserves order on P Chidambaram’s petition

THE ASIAN AGE. | PARMOD KUMAR
Published : Aug 30, 2019, 2:43 am IST
Updated : Aug 30, 2019, 2:43 am IST

The court said that it would peruse the material in case it decides that it can look into it.

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram
 Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its order on a plea by senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram, who has challenged the Delhi high court order rejecting his plea for anticipatory bail in the INX Media corruption and money-laundering case.

The high court had rejected his plea for anticipatory bail holding that the offences alleged against him were grave, he was evasive in replies to the questions by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and was the “kingpin” of the case.

 

Reserving the order that would be pronounced on September 5, the bench of Justice R. Banumathi and Justice A.S. Bopanna directed the ED to submit the case material that agency wanted court to see in a sealed cover with an authoritative seal.

The court said that it would peruse the material in case it decides that it can look into it. The court also recorded submission by Mr Chidambaram that the material the CBI has not put to him in the course of his questioning can’t be handed over to the court. Mr Chidambaram said that the limited question before the SC is whether he was evasive in responding to the questions put to him in the course of his questioning on December 19, 2018, January 7, and 21, 2019 on the laundering of the unlawful money generated from the alleged irregularities in the grant of FIPB clearance to INX Media in 2007, when he was the Union minister.

 

The allegations relates to alleged influence paddling by Karti Chidambaram with the members of the FIPB in securing its approval for overseas investments in INX Media amounting to `305 crore.

Rebutting the arguments by the ED that the material which the investigating agency wanted the court to see could not be shared with Mr Chidambaram, senior counsel Kapil Sibal said, “At no stage we have said that the material sought to be handed over to the court, should be given to us as well.”

Telling the court that material sought to be given in “sealed covers are not meant to seal the fate of an individual”, Mr Sibal said, “Denial of liberty is not a one-way street. There has to be fairness in procedure.”

 

Tags: p chidambaram, inx media corruption case