To gauge the fluctuations in air quality during Diwali, the Supreme Court has banned the sale of firecrackers in Delhi-NCR till November 1.
This ban, however, has left quite a few people unhappy; one of who is Chetan Bhagat. In a tweet that has since received a lot of flak, the author not only said that Diwali is incomplete without firecrackers, but also went on to lash out at other religions, saying festivals with “blood and gore” needed to be stopped instead. In no time, the best-selling author was royally trolled by Twitterati.
However, his tweet highlights a much larger issue: whether it is Dahi Handi, Moharram or Diwali, factions are unable to look beyond their religion. Not waiting to acknowledge instead the fact that regulations help to keep them safer.
Sumaira Abdulali, environmentalist and founder of the NGO Awaaz Foundation, says it is difficult to change social attitudes and the mindset of people. “Changing a social attitude and the way people think about the subject is always going to take time. An order or a law is just one part of it, but changing people’s perspective is always going to be a longer journey,” she muses.
While Diwali is one time when celebrities get together and urge their followers to indulge in pollution-free festivities, Chetan seemed to not just do that, but also make it a religious matter.
Stalin Dayanand, director of projects at Vanashakti, an environmental NGO, believes that religious factions need to understand the context of rules and regulations. “No one is banning firecrackers in villages since there is no dearth of open spaces, where the wind can blow the smoke away. It is only in the cities that these laws are being implemented,” he explains.
Stalin also goes on to blame the lack of planning in the region — pinning the fault on the government. “There are no open spaces or passages for wind to pass through the city. Buildings have been placed arbitrarily and, as such, there is no festival space where crackers can be burst without causing harm to the city’s environment. So, in a way, it is the government’s fault,” he shrugs.
The outrage has been equal — with groups of people calling out Chetan for his misinformed tweet and the Supreme Court for the ban. Anil Dharker, columnist, belongs to the latter group. “The ban on sale of firecrackers is a classic case of judicial overreach,” he rolls his eyes, adding, “The judiciary should stop taking up cases that have nothing to do with the judiciary. If a ban needed to be in place, the executive body should have done it — the local government or corporation in this case.”
When it comes to timely environmental issues like these, Anil says that there is collateral damage that needs to be taken into account as well. “Instead of a ban on fireworks so close to Diwali, measures could have been taken from last year to ensure that there were less emissions from firecrackers,” he concludes, firmly.
