Sustainability in the fashion industry faces an uphill climb.
London: Sustainability in fashion is a hot button topic, with retailer’s large and small racing to prove their green credentials, but the desire for new attire churns and the industry remains one of the world’s largest polluters as climate activists and watchdogs sound alarms.
The industry is the second largest consumer of water and is responsible for 8-10 per cent of global carbon emissions, more than all international flights and maritime shipping combined, according to the United Nations Environment Program.
“So, for example, it would take 13 years to drink the water that is used to make one pair of jeans and one T-shirt,” said Fee Gilfeather, a sustainability expert at the nonprofit OXFAM. “It’s just an incredible amount of environmental resources that are required for making the clothing that we wear.”
Harmful chemicals, global transport of goods and non-biodegradable packaging add to the environmental cost. The combined impact has put the industry under scrutiny among consumers who want to know where — and how — their clothes are produced. They’re demanding ethical practices and responsible retailing.
Some manufacturers and retailers have found innovative solutions, both large and small. At the high end of the market, designers are keen to make sustainable fashion synonymous with luxury. In 2015, a sustainability report by Nielsen found that 66 per cent of consumers are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly clothing. At the low, fast fashion end of the industry, promises have been made.
In addition, the global fashion sector addressed climate change by launching the Fashion Industry Charter for Climate Action at the COP24 climate conference in Katowice in December 2018. Leading fashion brands, retailers, supplier organizations, a major shipping company and global NGO WWF International have agreed to collectively address the climate impact of the industry across sectors. Patricia Espinosa, the executive secretary for UN Climate Change, said the charter comes at a time when “we needed it most.” The charter recognises the crucial role of fashion as a contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, with multiple opportunities to reduce emissions. It hopes to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 and notes a number of issues: decarbonisation of the production phase; selection of climate friendly and sustainable materials; the need for low-carbon transport; and improving consumer dialogue and awareness.
The scale of the charter is vast, but activists are up against behemoths at times. In Britain, the Environmental Audit Committee reported on the problem earlier this year and found that the U.K. buys more clothes than any other country in Europe, throwing away 1 million tonnes annually with 300,000 tonnes (over 661,000,000 pounds) going to incinerators or landfills. The EAC, chaired by Member of Parliament Mary Creagh, concluded that fashion retailers should take responsibility for the clothes they sell.
The Committee called for a producer responsibility scheme for textiles, which would add a small amount to the cost of each item, raising money to invest in recycling centres to divert clothing from landfills and incineration. The British government, then led by Prime Minister Theresa May, rejected all the committee’s proposals, much to the dismay of Fashion Revolution, a global movement calling for greater transparency, sustainability and ethics in the fashion industry.
“That set us back 20 years at the very, very least. It is inexcusable and frankly, unforgivable,” said the organization’s creative director and co-founder, Orsola De Castro. “Some of those recommendations, you’d think why would you not take that into consideration? And the reality is that the UK government on this occasion has also looked very out of touch because we are seeing quite a lot of policy change happening, for instance, in France. And it seems that them not getting up to speed on this is a terrible thing.”
The industry has other problems as well. It has been accused of unethical labour practices, though the tide began to turn after the Rana Plaza disaster in 2013, when an eight-story building containing a garment factory in Dhaka, Bangladesh, collapsed and killed 1,134 people.
“We’re seeing a huge rise in public demand over not just better products, but better buying habits. And we’re looking at a generation that is applying scrutiny that wants to know that brands are accountable. And obviously transparency has been really on the rise ever since the Rana Plaza disaster,” De Castro said.
But significant change throughout the industry, coupled with mass consumer action, has yet to come, she said. “Real effective changes? I don’t think we’re seeing any particular impact, but look, when it comes to awareness, massive difference,” De Castro said.