Saturday, May 21, 2022 | Last Update : 09:19 AM IST

  Metros   Delhi  26 Jan 2018  Bawana fire: Co-owner’s anticipatory bail rejected

Bawana fire: Co-owner’s anticipatory bail rejected

PTI
Published : Jan 26, 2018, 1:58 am IST
Updated : Jan 26, 2018, 1:58 am IST

The court had yesterday sent Manoj Jain, who was arrested on January 21, to five days police custody.

Delhi High Court. (Photo: Twitter)
 Delhi High Court. (Photo: Twitter)

New Delhi: A Delhi court on Thursday dismissed the anticipatory bail plea of a man, alleged co-owner of the fire- cracker storage unit in Bawana where 17 people were killed in a massive blaze, saying the allegations against him were “serious”.

Additional Sessions Judge Sukhvinder Kaur rejected the application filed on behalf of Lalit Goyal, whom the police has been referring to as a “partner” of factory owner Manoj Jain, who is already in police custody in connection with the probe in the January 20 fire tragedy.

 

“The allegations against the accused (Goyal) are serious in nature and matter is at the initial stage of investigation. As many as 17 persons were burnt to death in the incident.

“In light of the circumstances, I do not find it a case for grant of anticipatory bail to Goyal at this stage. Hence the application is dismissed,” the judge said.

Goyal, in his plea, claimed that he was just a servant in the factory and was neither named in the FIR nor was he present in the factory at the time of the incident.

Opposing his plea, additional public prosecutor Shiv Kumar submitted that the statements of two injured victims had been recorded before a magistrate in which they have stated that Goyal was a partner in the factory.

 

Advocate Rishipal Singh, appearing for victim Soni, who died along with her unborn child in the tragedy, argued as per the statements of injured victims Roop Prakash and Sunita Devi, Goyal was present at the spot when the incident took place, contrary to his claims.

The court had yesterday sent Manoj Jain, who was arrested on January 21, to five days police custody. The police had told the court that the custody of Jain was required to nab the absconding co-accused Lalit Goyal. 

Tags: bawana fire, delhi high court