Tuesday, Oct 20, 2020 | Last Update : 03:45 AM IST

195th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra1443409114960338084 Andhra Pradesh7192566588755981 Karnataka6406615157829286 Tamil Nadu6088555529389653 Uttar Pradesh4031013468595864 Delhi2827522506135401 West Bengal2603242287555017 Odisha222734190080912 Kerala204242131048772 Telangana1992761701091163 Bihar178882164537888 Assam169985139977655 Gujarat1332191132403417 Rajasthan1288591077181441 Haryana1237821059901307 Madhya Pradesh117588932382207 Punjab107096840253134 Chhatisgarh9856566860777 Jharkhand7770964515661 Jammu and Kashmir69832495571105 Uttarakhand4533233642555 Goa3107125071386 Puducherry2548919781494 Tripura2412717464262 Himachal Pradesh136799526152 Chandigarh112128677145 Manipur9791760263 Arunachal Pradesh8649623014 Nagaland5768469311 Meghalaya5158334343 Sikkim2707199431 Mizoram178612880
  Metros   Delhi  27 Feb 2020  SC raps Delhi police for inaction against provocative speeches

SC raps Delhi police for inaction against provocative speeches

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Feb 27, 2020, 1:49 am IST
Updated : Feb 27, 2020, 1:49 am IST

Justice Joseph said emphasising that the violence and the consequent loss of life was on account of police inaction.

Supreme Court of India (Photo: ANI)
 Supreme Court of India (Photo: ANI)

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up Delhi police for not taking action against those who had made inflammatory speeches and said that if it had acted as required by law and in time the violence that claimed nearly 20 lives could have been averted.

Justice K.M. Joseph, part of the two-judge bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, said: “If you had acted the way law required you to act and stopped people from making inflammatory remarks the spiral of violence could have been averted and lives saved.”

 

“Lack of professionalism of the police is the main problem here. If you had not allowed people to get away after inflammatory remarks, all this would not have happened. If you act the way law requires to act, you will see the difference,” Justice Joseph observed hitting out at Delhi police for its inaction.

The court was obviously pointing to police not taking cognisance of BJP leader Kapil Mishra making inflammatory remarks against those opposing Citizenship Amendment Act.

“I will say”, Justice Joseph retorted when solicitor general Tushar Mehta said that the observation from the judge may “demoralise the police” during these tense times.

 

“One of my constables has died. My DCP is injured. He is on ventilator. Let us not demoralise the police by saying anything now. We do not know what the situation on the ground is,” Mr. Mehta kept imploring the court.

“This will happen if you allow people to get away. Unless you get the police to act, there will be no difference. Look at how police acts in the U.K. Do they require somebody’s nod? If somebody makes an inflammatory remark, police swings into action immediately,” Justice Joseph said emphasising that the violence and the consequent loss of life was on account of police inaction which did not act the way it was expected.

 

Tags: supreme court