Wednesday, Jul 08, 2020 | Last Update : 08:09 PM IST

106th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra2171211185589250 Tamil Nadu118594711161636 Delhi102831742173165 Gujarat37636267441978 Uttar Pradesh2996819627313 Telangana2761216287313 Karnataka2681511100417 West Bengal2383715790804 Rajasthan2140416575472 Andhra Pradesh211979745252 Haryana1799913645279 Madhya Pradesh1562711768622 Bihar12525933898 Assam12523833016 Odisha10097670354 Jammu and Kashmir89315399143 Punjab67494554175 Kerala5895345228 Chhatisgarh3415272814 Uttarakhand3230262143 Jharkhand3018210422 Goa190311568 Tripura171612481 Manipur14307710 Himachal Pradesh107876410 Puducherry104351714 Nagaland6443030 Chandigarh4924017 Arunachal Pradesh270922 Mizoram1971390 Sikkim125650 Meghalaya94432
  Sports   Cricket  07 Nov 2019  No Shikhar Dhawan? Former chief selector names his replacement in T20Is

No Shikhar Dhawan? Former chief selector names his replacement in T20Is

THE ASIAN AGE
Published : Nov 7, 2019, 5:45 pm IST
Updated : Nov 7, 2019, 5:45 pm IST

Srikkanth said that even though there is no need to make a drastic change, they need to rethink the combination of the openers.

The former opener Kris Srikkanth went on to state that Shikhar Dhawan’s approach in T20Is is baffling and that KL Rahul could challenge for the role of the opener. (Photo: PTI)
 The former opener Kris Srikkanth went on to state that Shikhar Dhawan’s approach in T20Is is baffling and that KL Rahul could challenge for the role of the opener. (Photo: PTI)

Mumbai: Former Indian captain and chairman of the selection committee Krisnamachari Srikkanth implored India’s team management to find a solution to the problem of a settled combination of openers in T20Is. Srikkanth said that even though there is no need to make a drastic change, they need to rethink the combination of the openers.

In a column for The Times of India, he wrote, “The defeat in Delhi should not lead to any knee-jerk reaction. With the T20 World Cup in mind, these experiments are required and if you’re not fielding the best side, a reversal has to be accepted as part of the learning. However, the team management must find a settled combination sooner than later.”

He added, “Workload management is also vital, so the think tank does have their work cut out. As often in the past, India failed to accelerate during Powerplay. Rohit Sharma often makes it up but Shikar Dhawan does fail to shift gears when required and that has cost the team.”

The former opener went on to state that Dhawan’s approach in T20Is is baffling and that KL Rahul could challenge for the role of the opener. He said, “What baffles me is the approach of Dhawan. His inability to go out and play his natural game despite being a senior member is hurting the team. I will stick my neck out and field KL Rahul as an opener in this format. Along with Rohit, the team will have two explosive batsmen when field restrictions are in place.”

Even though Shikhar Dhawan was the top scorer for India in the 1st T20I against Bangladesh, his slow conversion rate could be the possible reason for his criticism by Kris Srikkanth.

Srikkanth also backed the severely criticised wicket-keeper, Rishabh Pant. He suggested that he would like to see Pant given a longer run at the number 4 position. He said, “With Virat Kohli firm at one-drop, I would like to see Rishabh Pant be given an extended (fair) run at four. Let’s face it, the top-four make or break games in T20s. Once we have settled batsmen who are assured of their roles, I am sure India will do well in the World Cup.”

He also went on to say, “I do understand the logic behind Saha taking over in Test cricket, but Pant should be the primary pick in white-ball cricket. Any comparison to MS Dhoni should stop. It is not doing the youngster any good and players like Dhoni are once in a generation.”

Tags: krishnamachari srikkanth, k srikanth, rohit sharma, shikhar dhawan, kl rahul
Location: India, Maharashtra, Mumbai (Bombay)