Jnanpith winner says award wapsi immature

Veteran Gujarati litterateur Raghuveer Chaudhary, chosen for the prestigious Jnanpith Award for 2015, has termed as an “immature step” the returning of awards by some eminent writers and said their way of protest was “not proper.”

Mr Chaudhary also said that writers could have used other ways to protest against the government rather than returning their awards as today’s situation is not that of Emergency.

“I firmly believe that returning of awards was an immature step by writers. Though these writers remained successful in attracting attention, it is not proper to give hype to an issue and register protest in this manner. There are many other ways available with a writer than to indulge in award wapsi,” the 77-year-old said on Wednesday.

A slew of writers have returned their awards in protest against what they called “growing intolerance” in the country in the wake of killings of some rationalists.

Mr Chaudhary became the fourth Gujarati writer to receive the country’s highest literary award. He also received Sahitya Akademi award for his novel trilogy Uparvaas in 1977.

Mr Chaudhary said a writer can still register his protest by other means, instead of challenging the rightfully elected government.

“Writers can definitely criticise government. They can also face arrest like many of us did in the past. But, today’s situation is not of Emergency. In democracy, we must allow elected leaders to complete their term, instead of asking them to step down,” he said.

On the Sahitya Akademi’s role in the wake of killings of some writers and rationalists, the novelist and poet said the literary body never hesitated in expressing its condolence.

“Those who announced to return their Akademi awards should know that the Akademi does not run the country. Further, the Akademi also played it’s part by expressing grief over the deaths” said Mr Chaudhary.